·
Lens 3 · Monte Carlo — where could the price go?
| Percentile | p5 | p25 | p50 | p75 | p95 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Was this cone honest historically? This name's calibration record →
The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental value.
What drives the odds
50,000 paths, carry-anchored: the drift is the 3M EIBOR with no ex-dividend date inside the window, so the median drifts gently up; the spread is the share’s own gap-aware volatility (annualized ~39%) after a provisional single-name UAE calibration — honestly flagged as provisional until a multi-name ADX panel exists. The forces the study reasons through are the Fed/CBUAE rate path (imported through the peg), how much the market trusts the marks on the unlisted portfolio, execution at the redeployed assets (Traverse, Mopani, Alphamin, ISEM), the operating-margin path ex-portfolio income, the DMTT tax glide, oil and the Abu Dhabi fiscal pulse, and float/index mechanics — plus event forces: the Q2 results and the attributable-earnings split, a related-party or portfolio transaction, a Fed surprise, and buyback/distribution news. The width was fitted on recent data, so read the downside percentiles as floors on risk, not ceilings. Details in the methodology.