Track record:  3-month windows checked ·  inside the 90% band () → every one dated, right or wrong

·
At a glance — the 3-lens summary → Calibration & ledger record →

Lens 3 · Monte Carlo — where could the price go?

Percentilep5p25p50p75p95

Was this cone honest historically? This name's calibration record →

The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental value.

What drives the odds

50,000 paths, 16 forces: GCC consumer & UAE tourism demand, the Snacking reset execution, the input-commodity basket (coffee, wheat, resin), EGP/JOD translation, water-category competition & the summer season, rates/ADX flows, and Red Sea logistics cost — plus event forces: the Q2 2026 print, an interim-dividend step-up, bolt-on M&A, a commodity spike, an EGP devaluation step, a regional geopolitical escalation, a KSA protein/food-security win, a Snacking-reset disappointment, and an ADQ corporate/index event. How the bands have actually held on this name: Over 58 resolved three-month forecasts, the price finished inside the 90% band 97% of the time, against the 90% that band aims at — and inside the 80% and 50% bands 91% and 76% of the time. — see the ledger and methodology.

Weigh the odds → Compare against another name → Full narrative study (current site) ↗ All editions (archive) →

No study found

That name isn't in the covered set. Browse Coverage or search above.