Track record:  3-month windows checked ·  inside the 90% band () → every one dated, right or wrong

·
At a glance — the 3-lens summary → Calibration & ledger record →

Lens 3 · Monte Carlo — where could the price go?

Percentilep5p25p50p75p95

Was this cone honest historically? This name's calibration record →

The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental value.

What drives the odds

50,000 paths, carry-anchored to the UAE production panel: the Pillar-Two tax path (10→13% mechanics vs a flat-15% assessment), the pace at which DSO normalizes off 135 days, the margin mix between fast-growing oncology and the group’s surgical base, the 7.00% sukuk’s funding-cost read-through, and the FY2025 DMTT return itself (filed 2026–27) which can reweight every lens at once. Genuinely thin float (~11%, some undisclosed buyback execution) keeps idiosyncratic volatility high relative to the panel. Details in the methodology.

Weigh the odds → Compare against another name → Full narrative study (current site) ↗ All editions (archive) →

No study found

That name isn't in the covered set. Browse Coverage or search above.