Track record:  3-month windows checked ·  inside the 90% band () → every one dated, right or wrong

·
At a glance — the 3-lens summary → Calibration & ledger record →

Lens 3 · Monte Carlo — where could the price go?

Percentilep5p25p50p75p95

Was this cone honest historically? This name's calibration record →

The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental value.

What drives the odds

50,000 paths, carry-anchored: the drift is the SAMA/Fed rate path against eXtra's ~7% dividend yield (the two are close, so the median is an explained flat), with the spread set by the Saudi-panel-fitted regime width. The forces the study reasons through are the rate path (financed demand + Tasheel's funding spread), non-oil GDP & Vision-2030 consumption, consumer-finance provisioning & regulation, e-commerce competition, the dividend signal, foreign flows and a momentum/mean-reversion tilt — plus event forces: a quarterly earnings surprise, a SAMA policy surprise, a dividend declaration, a provisioning/regulatory change and a regional event. Details in the methodology.

Weigh the odds → Compare against another name → Full narrative study (current site) ↗ All editions (archive) →

No study found

That name isn't in the covered set. Browse Coverage or search above.