Track record:  3-month windows checked ·  inside the 90% band () → every one dated, right or wrong

·
At a glance — the 3-lens summary → Calibration & ledger record →

Lens 3 · Monte Carlo — where could the price go?

Percentilep5p25p50p75p95

Was this cone honest historically? This name's calibration record →

The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental value.

What drives the odds

50,000 paths, 16 forces: seven continuous — global LNG-demand growth, charter-market tone, the US/global rate path (the discount-rate driver), Qatar Exchange index flows, the Brent/energy complex, the USD/QAR peg, and fleet utilisation — plus nine event forces: a quarterly results print, a North Field newbuild award/milestone, a dividend change, a charter renewal/extension, a rating/refinancing action, a Strait-of-Hormuz geopolitical event, a drydock/off-hire disruption, an index rebalancing, and a broad LNG-shipping market shock. Zero secular drift for a non-EGX name. Details in the methodology.

Weigh the odds → Compare against another name → Full narrative study (current site) ↗ All editions (archive) →

No study found

That name isn't in the covered set. Browse Coverage or search above.