EGX:RMDAupdated

Rameda

Fundamental — what it's worthbottom-up fair value
Lens 1 of 3Fundamental analysis — what is it worth?

Built up from projects, cash and earnings — what is it worth?

Is it cheap or expensive right now?

Latest price vs our fair value. A comparison, not a recommendation.

What it's worth

The lenses, side by side; the weighted central value is the anchor.

Lens / partPer share (EGP)How it's valued
FCFF DCF (primary)1.735-yr FCFF, Egyptian rate path · 35%
Relative (own band, the ceiling)4.40EV/EBITDA 6.5–9.5× on FY26E EBITDA · 25%
Normalized earnings3.65recurring core · 25%
DDM (policy, the floor)1.00payout-based · 15%
Fair value (weighted)2.77−45% vs latest · bear 2.11, bull 3.48

Full detail, all lenses, the expert panel and the open model are in the study.

Technical & price structuretrend, momentum, key levels
Lens 2 of 3Technical analysis — what is the chart doing?

Trend, momentum and key levels — what is the price doing now?

5.5 4.5 3.5 2.5 1.5 5.00 Q3 24 Q4 24 Q1 25 Q2 25 Q3 25 Q4 25 Q1 26 Q2 26 Q3 26
Price 50-day MA 200-day MADaily close · last 500 sessions to 17 Jun 2026

What the chart says

In plain terms: a compounding Egyptian pharma manufacturer, but the discounted-cash-flow lens (EGP 1.73, at Egypt's sourced cost of capital) and the market-multiple lenses (EGP 3.65–4.40) disagree by more than 2× — the market's EGP 5.00 is a bet that Egyptian rates normalise faster than the sourced curve says.

Key levels

Volatility & where the case breaks

Typical daily moveRoughly how far the price swings in an average day (ATR).~0.5 (2.2%)
Where our case breaksbelow ~1.73
Monte Carlo — where could the price go?near-term price paths
Lens 3 of 3Monte Carlo — where could the price go?

50,000 simulated futures — near-term price paths, independent of the fundamental value.

The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental levers above.

The exact percentiles

The 5th / 25th / middle / 75th / 95th outcomesLine up all 50,000 outcomes low to high — these are the values at the 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% marks., from 50,000 paths.

TimeframeRare low (5%)25%Middle75%Rare high (95%)

What drives the odds

50,000 paths, 16 forces: the CBE facility-cost path (24.0% observed effective → a norm-built 15% terminal), NWC normalisation speed (66.4% → 54% of revenue), the EDA pricing regime unwinding, USD-linked API costs, and the risk of a further EGP step-devaluation — Egypt has devalued five times since 2016, several by 14–45% in a single move, so this is modelled as a recurring risk, not a rare one-off. Details in the methodology.

Peer set & risks

How it compares to the others we cover

"Cheap / expensive" = vs our fair value. Not advice.

About this series & how we build these

Want the full study and the spreadsheet?

Full write-up plus the editable Excel model.

Found a flaw? Attack the model

Sent straight to info@testahil.com — we fix confirmed flaws in public.

Open the study (PDF) Open the model (Excel)

The full study (PDF) and Excel model are available on a computer.

Edition: 17 Jun 2026. Older editions stay in the Library.

Compare RMDA vs peers →What kept its value? →