TADAWUL:2010updated

Saudi Basic Industries

Fundamental — what it's worthbottom-up fair value
Lens 1 of 3Fundamental analysis — what is it worth?

Built up from an explicit five-year cash-flow forecast, the dividend yield, relative multiples and the asset/replacement base — what is it worth?

Is it cheap or expensive right now?

Latest price vs our fair value. A comparison, not a recommendation.

What it's worth — four lenses

Four independent valuation methods, blended into one weighted central fair value.

Valuation lensPer share (SAR)Weight
DCF (5-yr FCFF, mid-cycle) — primary60.340%
Dividend-yield (normalized)56.425%
EV/EBITDA relative (trough floor)47.820%
P/B (asset / replacement)51.515%
Weighted central fair value55.5+7% vs spot

The four lenses span SAR 47.8 (EV/EBITDA on trough earnings, the floor) to SAR 60.3 (the mid-cycle DCF, the top of the cluster) and straddle spot — the asset base and the dividend look cheap, the trough multiple looks full. The product–feedstock spread in $/tonne and whether the margin normalises are the swing factors. Full detail and the four lenses are in the study and the open model.

Technical & price structuretrend, momentum, key levels
Lens 2 of 3Technical analysis — what is the chart doing?

Trend, momentum and key levels — what is the price doing now?

48.056.364.672.981.2 Q3 24Q4 24Q1 25Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q3 26
Price 50-day MA 200-day MADaily close · last 500 sessions to 7 Jul 2026

What the chart says

In plain terms: Saudi Basic Industries trades a few percent below our weighted central fair value — roughly fairly valued to modestly cheap, at a cyclical trough in the global petrochemical margin. It is the Gulf's petrochemical champion, ~70%-owned by Saudi Aramco, converting advantaged Saudi gas and naphtha into polymers, agri-nutrients and specialties. 2025 was a genuine trough — Chinese oversupply, weak global demand and a compressed product–feedstock spread pushed the adjusted EBITDA margin to ~15% and produced a large one-off, non-cash writedown on the European assets being divested. The bull case (~SAR 66) is the spread normalising toward a mid-cycle ~19% margin while the low-cost feedstock advantage is credited in full; the cautious case (~SAR 43) is a structurally lower spread — a permanent Chinese-oversupply regime. What moves it is the product–feedstock spread in $/tonne and the timing of the margin-cycle recovery.

Key levels

Volatility & where the case breaks

Typical daily moveRoughly how far the price swings in an average day (based on a measure called ATR). Bigger means choppier.~1.5%
Monte Carlo — where could the price go?near-term price paths
Lens 3 of 3Monte Carlo — where could the price go?

50,000 simulated futures — near-term price paths, independent of the fundamental value.

The 5th–95th and 25th–75th percentile bands from the 50,000-path simulation. Static and pre-computed — independent of the fundamental levers above.

The exact percentiles

The 5th / 25th / middle / 75th / 95th outcomesLine up all 50,000 outcomes low to high — these are the values at the 5%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 95% marks., from 50,000 paths.

TimeframeRare low (5%)25%Middle75%Rare high (95%)

What drives the odds

50,000 paths, 16 forces: the product–feedstock spread, the oil/naphtha complex and global industrial demand, SAMA/Fed rates via the riyal peg, US real rates, TASI/GCC flows, the base-dividend anchor and Saudi feedstock policy — plus event forces: a petchem cycle turn, prolonged Chinese oversupply, an oil-price shock, a Red Sea/freight disruption, a dividend-policy signal, a plant turnaround or expansion milestone, an earnings/impairment print, and an Aramco-parent action. Details in the methodology.

Peer set & risks

Where Saudi Basic Industries sits in its markets

SABIC is the Gulf’s petrochemical champion — polymers, agri-nutrients and specialties — roughly 70%-owned by Saudi Aramco and built on advantaged Saudi feedstock. Peers trade in different currencies and aren’t directly value-comparable, so this is a competitive map, not a price table.

ArenaSABIC's positionMain rivals
Global commodity petrochemicalsTop-tier integratedDow · LyondellBasell · Formosa Plastics
Feedstock cost positionAdvantaged (Saudi gas / ethane)far below naphtha-based peers
Polyolefins (PE / PP / MEG)Major global producerDow · ExxonMobil Chemical · LyondellBasell
Agri-nutrients (urea / ammonia)via SABIC Agri-NutrientsNutrien · CF Industries · OCI
Specialties & engineering plasticsReshaping (European exit)BASF · Covestro
Ownership / parent~70% Saudi Aramcointegrated with the crude major

The investment debate turns less on any single arena than on the product–feedstock spread and whether the 2025 margin trough normalises as SABIC completes its European divestitures and leans on its feedstock advantage. Minority holders are also price-takers under a 70% strategic parent. Competitive map, not advice.

About this series & how we build these

Want the full study and the spreadsheet?

Full write-up plus the editable Excel model.

Found a flaw? Attack the model

Sent straight to info@testahil.com — we fix confirmed flaws in public.

Open the study (PDF) Open the model (Excel)

The full study (PDF) and Excel model are available on a computer.

Edition: 7 Jul 2026. Older editions stay in the Library.

Compare SABIC vs peers →What kept its value? →